Within the Crucible

When Suffering Strikes

Martin Luther said oratio, meditatio, and tentatio (prayer, meditation, and trial) are the indispensable ingredients for proper theological study.

For years I’ve labored as a pastor convinced of Luther’s laws, but to tell the truth, I’ve only experienced two of them with any regularity. Prayer and meditation have been faithful friends, yet trials has been something of a distant relative—until last fall. Tentatio knocked on my door around November and he seems to have taken up an extended residence in my life.

The Trials We’ve Faced

Our season of suffering arrived when one of our deacons found out his third child would likely not survive many hours outside the womb. God’s hand of providence took baby Eli home a few months before his due date and we wept together. Death struck again just ten days ago when a beloved church member’s heart unexpectedly failed in the middle of the night and his earthly pilgrimage came to an end.

In between we’ve watched another dear member waste away before our eyes as cancer ravages his body. We’ve counseled church members with immediate and extended family members passing away. We’ve walked through instances of secret sin seeking to steal souls and mar relationships. We’ve prayed with brothers and sisters in Christ whose bodies are failing. The storm clouds of suffering still hover overhead.

I’m thus getting a first sense of how trial teaches and shapes not only our theology, but our church’s life together. Tentatio is indeed a faithful tutor when it’s married to faith in Christ. Here are the sweet lessons we’ve feasted on these last few months.

What the Trials Teach

Suffering has brought us greater unity. Like soldiers fighting in a foxhole together creates unusually strong relationships, so too does suffering together bring peculiar unity to a church. Many relationships now have a strength from shared suffering that I doubt could have come in any other way. Intercessory prayer is more active. Concerns of mercy and benevolence, already large, seem to burst forth at every corner. It’s quite difficult to let petty differences and disputes reign when death is moving. Which leads to the second lesson . . .

Suffering has brought us joyful perspective. We’ve learned afresh that life is short, death is real, and pain is great. Yet, oh how kind God is to comfort us in grief! These are principles many of us have heard about and endured separately, but now have experienced them together. We’ve seen how God’s promises take on new significance when suffering strikes. The ministry of God’s word becomes ever sweeter. The songs of the saints rise with greater volume. The vaporous nature of life is more keenly felt. This renewed perspective is a means to what is the ordinary walk of a Christian this side of heaven: joy in suffering.

Suffering has taught us the unshakeable power of God’s word. Without the truth of Scripture, what meaning can we find in suffering? Without God’s self-revelation, how can we know how Christ relates to our pain? Without God’s word, where would we find hope and strength?

What I’ve seen—maybe most acutely—over these last few months is what happens when a church lives in, around, and under the Truth. The Word is everything to God’s people. Like Luther famously said in another place, “The word did it all.” God’s word is the ballast in the boat of our corporate life.

Seasons of suffering, like the one we’re in, are times when our corporate boat sails through storms of Satan’s fury and death’s wrath. Our enemies sling their greatest waves our way and mean to tip us over. What will we do? Grieve we will, but fall we won’t, for our Lord has conquered death. What is left for God’s people is to stand on the truth of God’s word and in the victory of God’s Son.

And so we sail towards the heavenly city with confidence and certainty in spite of the storm, for nothing can assail God’s power delivered through His ordinary means. This is what tentatio has taught us.

More Wooing Than Warning

“Although every preacher must both woo and warn, the most regular note should be of wooing more than warning, more of the carrot than the stick, more of the beauty of holiness than the ugliness of sin, more of drawing Christ than highlighting the danger of the Devil, more of the attraction of heaven than the fear of hell.

“Let’s present Christ to our congregations or to our children and colleagues in all His glory. Let’s show them how much Jesus is willing and able to save and how much He desires and delights to save. He does not save because He has to but because He wants to and enjoys to.” — David Murray, The Happy Christian, 38.

Keller Lectures on Preaching

Last fall Tim Keller delivered the John Reed Miller Lectures on Preaching at Reformed Theological Seminary in Jackson, Mississippi. Listen to the four lectures here or watch them below.

Lecture 1: “What is Good Preaching?”

Lecture 2: “Preaching to Secular People and Secularized Believers”

Lecture 3: “Preaching the Gospel Every Time”

Lecture 4: “Preaching to the Heart”

Why Piper Preaches From A Manuscript

Preaching from a Manuscript

If you listen to some of the earliest biographical sermons John Piper preached at the Bethlehem Conference for Pastors (which eventually took the name “Desiring God Pastors Conference”) you’ll notice each one has a Q&A session at the end. Evidently this was when only a small crowd attended and so the setting was right for reflecting together.

At the 1990 conference Piper delivered a message entitled, “Oh, That I May Never Loiter On My Heavenly Journey! Reflections on the Life and Ministry of David Brainerd.” During the Q&A time one attendee asked Piper about his practice of delivering a sermon — whether he preached with an outline, no notes, or a manuscript. Here’s what he said:

As one who preaches from a manuscript I especially resonated with his language of being “an intellectual cripple.”

You could check out my post “Some Merits of a Manuscript” for 3 reasons why I find it helpful to manuscript my sermons.

The Right Mood of Preaching

I love to preach in such a mood, not as though I was about to preach at all, but hoping that the Holy Spirit would speak through me. . . . Dependence upon God is the flowing fountain of success. That true saint of God, George Muller, has always struck me, when I have heard him speak, as being such a simple, child-like being in his dependence upon God; but, alas! the most of us are far too great for God to use us; we can preach as well as anybody, make a sermon with anybody,—and so we fail. Take care, brethren; for if we think we can do anything of ourselves, all we shall get from God will be the opportunity to try.” – Spurgeon, An All-Round Ministry, 183.

On Preaching with Steve Lawson

Last week I listened to an “In the Room” podcast episode with H.B. Charles and it was extraordinarily helpful (listen to it here). In the course of the interview I found out H.B. has his own podcast. So I ventured over to iTunes, found his “On Preaching Podcast” and my eyes immediately widened when I saw that H.B. had recently interviewed Steve Lawson for over two hours on preaching.

I’ve long thought Lawson is an underrated powerhouse of exposition. He is Macarthur-esque in his bold dogmatism and Spurgeon-esque in his unwavering commitment to God’s word. You’ll want to check out H.B.’s interview with Lawson to hear about his call to the ministry, his amazing preaching influences, why he thinks pastors should get away from the computer, and how R.C. Sproul changed the way he speaks. Listen or watch the interview below.

Listen to Part 1 of the Interview with Steve Lawson.

Listen to Part 2 of the Interview with Steve Lawson.

To Yourself First, Then To Them

“A man preacheth that sermon only well unto others which preacheth itself in his own soul. And he that doth not feed on and thrive in the digestion of the food which he provides for others will scarce make it savoury unto them; yea, he knows not but the food he hath provided may be poison, unless he have really tasted of it himself. If the word do not dwell with power in us, it will not pass with power from us.” – John Owen, Works Vol: XVI, 76.

Tethered Preaching

TSGJohn Piper’s The Supremacy of God in Preaching is probably my favorite book on the subject. When reading the book you can’t help but feel the gravitas of proclaiming God’s word loading your soul—in a wondrous way.

Twenty-five years after its original publication Baker just published a revised version that includes four brand new chapters representing Pipers thoughts on preaching after thirty-three years at Bethlehem Baptist. One of the new chapters is titled, “In Honor of Tethered Preaching: John Calvin and the Entertaining Pastor.” Let me whet your appetite for the new edition with Piper’s answer to the question, “What is an Entertainment-Oriented Preacher?”

The difference between an entertainment-oriented preacher and a Bible-oriented preacher is the presence or absence of a manifest connection between the preacher’s words and the Bible as the authorization of what he says.

The entertainment-oriented preacher gives the impression that he is not tethered to an authoritative book in what he says. What he says doesn’t seem to be shaped and constrained by an authority outside himself. He gives the impression that what he says has significance for reasons other than that it manifestly expresses the meaning and significance of the Bible. So he seems untethered to objective authority.

The entertainment-oriented preacher seems to be at ease talking about many things that are not drawn out of the Bible. In his message, he seems to enjoy more talking about other things than what the Bible teaches. His words seem to have a self-standing worth as interesting or fun. They are entertaining. But they don’t give the impression that this man stands as the representative of God before God’s people to deliver God’s message.

What then is a “Bible-oriented preacher?” Grab a copy today to find out!

The Judged, Not “The Judge”

“[A] God-centered focus of preaching will change [the listener’s] assessment of the preacher and the preaching. If people know they have encountered God, they do not praise the preacher. The focus stays on God. They no longer stand over the preacher as a judge of his sermon ‘performance.’ Though one moment they are the judge, the next they perceive that they are being judged. This perception should lead to a different diagnostic question in regard to preaching. The question will no longer be, ‘How was the sermon?’ because that question calls for the hearer to judge how the preacher did. Instead it will be, ‘How did your soul fare under the sermon?’ or ‘How did God address you in the sermon?’ – Jason Meyer, Preaching: A Biblical Theology, 246.

Kindling Hearts in Preaching

Him We Proclaim

It is one of those elements in preaching that is seems to come solely through experience. It is better caught than taught. It has enormous potential to help or harm a sermon. What is it?

Tone.

Diagnosing A Nag

When I first began to preach I did so like many young preachers—zealously, but somewhat recklessly. I ascended to the sacred desk every six to eight weeks without many proper foundations in place. In fact, I was solidifying sermonic convictions on the spot. “Oh yeah,” I thought after one week, “Paul definitely has it right when he told the Colossians, ‘Pray that I may make it clear, which is how I ought to speak.'” Later I befriended “main point preaching” and that always necessary tool named “Order.” Discriminatory application was light-going-off-in-your-head discovery which came about three years into somewhat regular preaching as an associate pastor. As these convictions fell into place I still had a nagging feeling as though I was missing out on something essential; a key convictional cog yet to be discovered.

Eventually I planted a church and started preaching every week. The unaddressed nag soon became a growing weight.

Something was missing and I couldn’t put my finger on it. Year One went into the books, Year Two said, “Adios,” and I’d yet to get my homiletical hands around diagnosing the nag that was becoming a drag.

Believe it or not, the diagnosis only came about five weeks ago: I had no articulated understanding of the tone I longed to have in preaching.

Maybe a helpful way to communicate the problem is to make it analogous to a problem I often have in sermon prep. It usually doesn’t take me long to get a proper sense of a passage’s meaning and message, but it can take me a while to adequately summarize it into a sentence. Until I get that sentence down I feel somewhat aimless. The same thing was happening with tone in preaching. I knew faithful preaching meant declaring God’s word with a variety of characteristics such as boldness (Eph. 6:20) and clarity (Col. 4:4). I just wasn’t able to get all those characteristics summarized into a cohesive definition of what tone ought to permeate faithful preaching.

So I hit the books to see what they’d say.

What the Masters Say

One afternoon I grabbed a handful of books on preaching from the study to analyze what they teach about tone. Not surprisingly, there is quite a bit of uniformity on the matter.

In Evangelical Eloquence R.L. Dabney says a good sermon as “evangelical tone. This is a gracious character, appropriate to the proclamation of that gospel where ‘mercy and truth meet together, and righteousness and peace kiss each other’ . . . to deliver evangelical matter in any other tone is inappropriate to the preacher’s attitude, as a ransomed sinner honored to become the herald of the law and of mercy to the lost.”

Spurgeon speaks about tone in a variety of ways, but it’s safe to say The Prince believes earnestness is it’s proper quality. In his lecture, “Earnestness: Its Marring and Maintenance,” Spurgeon writes, “If I were asked—What in a Christian minister is the most essential quality for securing success in [preaching]? I should reply, ‘earnestness’: and if I were asked a second or a third time, the conclusion that, as a rule, real success is proportionate to the preacher’s earnestness.”

John Stott, in Between Two Worlds, gives a somewhat sustained discourse on tone in the book’s last two chapters. It’s hard to summarize in a sentence, but you can hang his argument on these four pillars: sincerity, earnestness, courage, and humility.

In The Supremacy of God in Preaching John Piper commends Thomas Chalmers’ example of “blood-earnestness” and Spurgeon’s reverent solemnity. Piper’s personal thesis on tone is this: “Gravity and gladness should be woven together in the life and preaching of a pastor in such a way as to sober the careless soul and sweeten the burdens of the saints.”

Complete with anatomical figures for resonation and articulation, Haddon Robinson’s classic Biblical Preaching argues for a homiletical tone marked by diversity. He says, “Monopitch drones us to sleep or wears upon us like a child pounding on the same not on the piano.”

Bryan Chapell’s textbook Christ-Centered Preaching contains a useful discussion on “the attitudes”—or tones—of proper exposition. After taking into account all preaching terms found in sacred Scripture Chapell says, “Just as no one word captures all the dimensions of biblical preaching, so no one [tone] can reflect its many facets.” If there is a universal foundation for all preaching Chapell would settle on “a humble boldness.” He concludes, “Our tone should always resonate with the humility of one who speaks with authority under the authority of another.”

Tony Merida’s Faithful Preaching would agree with the aforementioned marks of boldness, sincerity, and humility. He adds a unique wrinkle when he encourages, “Speak with conversational tone like you would normally speak to another person . . . a conversational tone does not mean that you speak without pathos, of course. Even in a one-on-one conversation you still speak with emphasis, passion, and variety.”

In Preach Mark Dever and Greg Gilbert give five aspects of tone “we should desire in our sermons.” It must be: biblical, humble, clear, sober and serious, and “suffused with a joyful confidence.”

Finally, you have to love Jason Meyer’s lucid language on tone in his Preaching: A Biblical Theology. He writes, “[My] emphasis on heralding is on tone of the delivery. Preaching is not discussing or explaining something with the tone and tenor of a fireside chat. The ‘herald’ is the town crier that speaks with the forceful tone of ‘hear ye, hear ye.’ In other words, the herald made his proclamation with a rousing ‘attention-getting noise’ that could not be ignored.”

Bringing it All Together

I’d read many of those books years ago, but something finally clicked when I read the relevant sections in one sitting. Here now is how I’d articulate the tonal aim in preaching.

The Vertical Dimension: “Reverent Affection”

We must recognizethat we preach as God’s mouthpieces in God’s pulpit. We must therefore think, first and foremost, about the tonal quality required in our preaching before God.

For me, the phrase “reverent affection” best captures the fullness of a faithful preacher’s disposition before God. The Lord dwells in unapproachable light and blinding holiness, so levity and triviality must be banished when standing behind the sacred desk. To be entrusted with His infallible, inspired, living, active, powerful, and eternal word demands that our preaching must be done in a vibrant fear of God. We must preach with the full weight of reverence.

But we’d miss out on something if we stopped there. Yes, God dwells in unapproachable light, but through faith in Christ we can come to His shining throne with confidence! He calls us His children and sings over us with great delight. Our reverence must thus be married to a compelling, childlike love for the Father. This means amazement at God’s glory, delight in His mercy, and praise for His provision in Christ will be hallmarks in each sermon.

Our sermons need the winsome weight of “reverent affection.”

The Horizontal Dimension: “Urgent Love”

A preacher is a steward of God and shepherd of men. God intends our preaching to be ordinary way in which He saves sinners and sanctifies saints. What then should be the spiritual sense—the tone—in which we want to preach toward men? I believe it’s best summarize as “urgent love.”

We are in the wrong business if Spirit-wrought, heart-rending urgency isn’t consistently bubbling up in our exposition. Souls hang in the balance every time God’s word is preached. Aromas of life and death rise, and our Cornerstone will either comfort or crush. Faithful preachers want everyone who hears the sermon to experience Jesus’ living comfort. All of these realities mean urgency must come through each week. Let there be something of the Baptist in all our preaching, “Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!”

Urgency can be a harsh sword if it isn’t also married with love. Faithful shepherds love the sheep and can’t help but saturate their sermons with expressions of tender care and warmth. To adapt the great apostle’s instruction in Colossians 3, we might say, “In all the sermonic elements put on love, which binds them together in perfect harmony.”

Spiritual Kindling

All his life Robert Murray M’Cheyne felt a yearning towards foreign missions. He loved to hear about God’s work among the nations. When his friend Alexander Duff returned from missionary work and spoke about God’s work in India M’Cheyne was in the audience and said, “[Duff] spoke with greater warmth and energy than ever. He kindles as he goes.”

That last little statement is why we should think hard about tone in preaching. Tone has spiritual power to kindle a flame for God as it goes. What kind of flame is your tone kindling? I hope my preaching is one that fans a consuming fire of reverent affection before God and urgent love towards men.